Why Paralympic sprinters have trouble with curves
An artificial leg slows a runner when it’s on the inside of a curve
Curves tend to put the brakes on human runners. They’re even harder for amputees using an artificial limb. Research now shows that even which leg the prosthesis is on can affect how fast someone can take a curve.
Two important forces are in play when a sprinter rounds a bend. First, working against gravity slows a runner. But centripetal (Sen-TRIP-eh-tul) force also is at work. It pulls something on a circular path toward the center of the curve. And it, too, will slow a runner down.
Studies have suggested that when an experienced sprinter goes around a turn, the inside leg creates less force than the outside one. So researchers at the University of Colorado at Boulder wanted to see how this might affect runners with artificial limbs. To find out, a team from its Applied Biomechanics Lab filmed such U.S. and German runners.
The Paralympic Games is an international sporting competition for athletes with physical disabilities. Like the Olympics, this group hosts summer and winter games every four years.
The scientists compared Paralympic sprinters who had amputations above the ankle to non-amputee runners. They also looked at each as they ran clockwise and counterclockwise around a track. Someone with a prosthetic limb on the inside of a curve ran 3.9 percent slower than runners with one on the outside of the curve.
Most amputee runners wear J-shaped prosthetic limbs. That absorbs then releases energy, much as a human ankle does. But these devices can’t create as much force as a real ankle does. So amputee runners make up for this by swinging their legs faster.
Sprinters whose prostheses were on the inside of a curve also decreased the speed of their steps, the researchers found. So they couldn’t compensate as well for their artificial limb generating less force against the ground compared to a regular ankle.
Paralympic races always run counterclockwise. Left-leg amputees therefore may be at a disadvantage, the data indicate.
The team published its results in the March 16 issue of the Journal of Experimental Biology.